Skip to content
← All articles

Workflow Notes

How to choose your first small business automation

Use five questions to describe one repetitive workflow and decide whether a bounded proof is worth testing.

By Racoben

Choose a task you can describe

Start with one task that has a recognizable beginning and end. For example, a routine inquiry arrives and someone turns it into a review-ready job brief. Choosing a bounded task makes it possible to discuss what the software should do and how a person will judge the result.

Avoid starting with a request to automate an entire business. A broad goal can hide several different workflows, each with different access, exception and review needs.

Answer five questions

What arrives? Describe one input type without including private customer information in the initial inquiry. What repeats? List the copying, checks and corrections people actually perform. What should come out? Name the desired output and where a reviewer will use it.

How often does the task happen? Record frequency and handling time, distinguishing measurements from estimates. What happens when it is wrong? Explain the failure cost and which decisions need a person’s review.

These questions give a scope conversation something concrete to work with. They do not establish that automation is suitable; they make suitability easier to assess.

Use a representative sample

Illustrative example, not a customer result: a repair inquiry becomes a structured brief containing the requested work, an approximate timing field and missing information. The proof should preserve uncertainty instead of inventing details the inquiry never supplied.

Test different kinds of approved, non-sensitive sample inputs. Include incomplete examples and common exceptions. Decide what counts as an acceptable result before treating an attractive demonstration as evidence of readiness.

Keep the first commitment bounded

An initial proof should specify the input, output, review step and acceptance checks. Discuss production access, ongoing support and operating cost separately. A proof on samples is not evidence that a live workflow is ready to run without supervision.

Racoben’s $299 Workflow Proof tests one agreed input-to-output workflow on approved, non-sensitive samples. Scope and acceptance checks are agreed before payment. Production work is scoped separately. Use the current intake to describe the task in ordinary language; keep private customer documents out of that initial description.

Describe your workflow

Use the existing intake to describe one repetitive task.

Describe your workflow ↗